Legal Opinion

State v. Clobes

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1988No. C7-87-1606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant James Clobes was found guilty of assault in the second, third and fifth degrees. He petitioned for postconviction relief and a new trial. Appellant claimed the jury instructions were incorrect, the prosecutor failed to disclose possible exculpatory evidence, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied his motion. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of failure to disclose.

FACTS

In February 1986 appellant introduced Sherri Luoma, with whom he was living, to David Fashingbauer. Appellant and Fash-ingbauer were both…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Rosillo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ClobesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API