Legal Opinion

King v. Fereday

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1987No. 19681PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Sonja King (“plaintiff”) sued for injuries suffered after defendant Fereday’s truck struck plaintiff’s car and for aggravation of those injuries and for subsequent injuries arising out of a collision with Joe Barron. Plaintiff Michael King (“Mr. King”) sued defendants for loss of consortium. Prior to trial, the judge dismissed Mr. King’s action for failure to state a claim, severed this suit from the one brought by plaintiff against Joe Barron, and denied a part of plaintiffs’ motion in limine. After trial, the jury found Fereday (“defendant”) zero percent negligent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hackford v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. First Interstate Bank of Utah v. KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. E.A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. W.C. Foy & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Heslop v. Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hansen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Reeves v. GentileUtah Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API