Legal Opinion

Hackford v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. 20208PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Appellant Sherrie Hackford appeals from a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of her claim for loss of consortium. The issue presented on appeal is whether in Utah a wife may maintain an action for loss of consortium for an injury to her husband caused by a third party’s alleged negligence. We adhere to our prior decisions and hold that neither spouse has a right to recover for the loss of consortium under Utah law. The judgment below is affirmed.

Sherrie Hackford alleges in her complaint that her husband, Greg Hackford, suffered an incapacitating injury when his head came in contact…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. O'NEAL v. Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Norton v. MacFarlaneUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Elgin v. BartlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API