Legal Opinion
Larmanger v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2014No. 13-35050UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Kimerie Larmanger appeals the judgment entered in favor of the defendants on her claims for interference under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA); retaliation under Oregon Revised Statutes §§ 659A.030(l)(f)-(g), 659A.199, 659A.230; and common law unlawful discharge. Reviewing de novo, see George v. Edholm, 752 F.3d 1206, 1214 (9th Cir.2014), we affirm.
1. The district court properly granted summary judgment on Larmanger’s FMLA/OFLA claims. Larmanger suggests her request for and use of medical leave was a negative factor in the June 2009…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kathryn Sheppard v. David Evans and Assoc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Clifford George v. Thomas EdholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Seitz v. State Ex Rel. Albina Human Resources Center & the Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Fayette County Board of Education v. Kelvin Bruce MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025
- Hejazi v. Rise, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Miller v. St. Charles Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Newell v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.