Seitz v. State Ex Rel. Albina Human Resources Center & the Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*667WARREN, J.
Plaintiff petitions for review of our decision affirming the judgment without opinion. 96 Or App 547, 773 P2d 28 (1989). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it in the light of Sheets v. Knight, 308 Or 220, 779 P2d 1000 (1989), which held that Oregon recognizes the concept of “constructive discharge.”
Plaintiff argues that the trial court used the wrong standard of causation in holding that she was not constructively discharged from employment. Defendant argues that plaintiff has no statutory cause of action under ORS chapter 659, because the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Palmer v. Bi-Mart CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hardie v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Mains v. II Morrow, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Winnett v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Schram v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.