Legal Opinion
Hejazi v. Rise, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 5, 2023No. 6:18-cv-02102Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Civ. No. 6:18-cv-02102-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. RISE, INC., Defendant. ________________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Defendant Rise, Inc. terminated Plaintiff Hamid Michael Hejazi’s employment following Plaintiff’s conduct toward Defendant and Defendant’s employees. Plaintiff brought this employment action claiming whistleblower retaliation and common law wrongful discharge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 70, which is GRANTED…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Nada Raad v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hashimoto v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.