Legal Opinion

Ghaster v. City of Fostoria

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1926No. 19618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

Several important legal questions are presented by this record for determination. First, is the location of the tracks of the steam railroad so near to the property line of the abutting owner as to prevent trucks or other ordinary vehicles from passing or being loaded or unloaded without danger from passing trains such an obstruction to or interference with access as to constitute a taking of private property in violation of Section 19 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution, which requires that a taking pf private property for public purposes shall first be compensated in money, or first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Sargent v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Jones v. Erie & Wyoming Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ZiemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hillsboro Plantation v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Dunnebacke v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Conboy v. City of NaplesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Anthony Carlin Co. v. Halle Bros. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Bales v. BromeWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API