State ex rel. Schiederer v. Preston
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Taft, J,
Relator is entitled to compensation for any property rights of relator that may have been taken from her by reason of the construction described in her petition; and we will assume that, as contended, mandamus is a proper remedy to require respondents to appropriate any property rights so taken. See State, ex rel. McKay, Exr., v. Kauer, Dir. of Highways, 156 Ohio St., 347, 102 N. E. (2d), 703.
The question to be decided is whether there will be a taking of property because the raising of the grade of part of a street in front of the land abutting on that street will substantially…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Trattar v. RauschOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Weir v. Palm Beach CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. BucsiOhio Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.