Legal Opinion

Swindell v. State ex rel. Maxey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1895No. 17,469PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

The relators, James W. Maxey and William O’Keefe, instituted and prosecuted this action in the lower court, in the name of the State, to obtain a writ of mandate against the appellant, as the mayor of the city of Plymouth, Marshall county, Indiana, to compel him to recognize each of them as members of the common council of the city, and permit each of them to exercise the duties of the office of councilman. The application for the writ substantially sets forth that on April 25, 1873, Plymouth was incorporated as a city, under and in pursuance of the general laws of the State of Indiana,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bills v. City of GoshenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Logansport v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Clark v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Wallace v. FeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API