Legal Opinion
Swecker v. Trans Union Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 23, 1998No. CIV. A. 98-1653-APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, plaintiffs Motion to Remand Action to State Court is GRANTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this action be and is remanded to the General District Court of Arlington County.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record and plaintiff, pro se, and to remand this action forthwith to the Arlington County General District Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the pro se plaintiffs Motion to Remand Action to State Court. Because we find that the issues are ready for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- James C. Rayner v. Daniel W. Smirl Csx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riley v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
- Wells v. Shelter General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
- Barnhill v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
- Jeffery v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Watkins v. Trans Union, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.