Legal Opinion

James C. Rayner v. Daniel W. Smirl Csx Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1989No. 88-3130PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

The question here is whether the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 971, as amended, 45 U.S.C. § 421-44, preempts a Maryland action for the wrongful discharge of a railroad employee who reports railroad safety violations of his employer. We hold that the federal “whistleblower” statute, 45 U.S.C. § 441, and the comprehensive remedial provisions incorporated therein, 45 U.S.C. §§ 441(c) & 153, are the railroad employee’s exclusive remedy and therefore preempt his state-law claim. We affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the employee’s state…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Douglas E. Wall v. Csx Transportation, Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation, Docket No. 05-4065-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Stephen H. Peters v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Peter Ball v. Memphis Bar-B-Q Company, Incorporated, Secretary of Labor, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API