Legal Opinion

Matter of Floyd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1996No. 24390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline proceeding, respondent admitted misconduct regarding the matters described below. A hearing was conducted by a three-member panel solely on the issue of sanction. The panel recommended an indefinite suspension with conditions for readmission. The Executive Committee, while adopting the panel’s findings of fact and conclusion of law, recommended disbarment. We agree with the Executive Committee that the appropriate sanction is disbarment.

The Morrell Matter

Respondent was closing attorney for the refinancing of two pieces of the Morrells’ property. He failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. In the Matter of BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. In the Matter of WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. In re McLellanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonChesapeake County Circuit Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API