Legal Opinion

Rust v. Guinn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1981No. 1-381A81PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Presiding Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is an action for abatement of a nuisance and damages brought by Hubert Guinn, Jr. and Margaret Suzanne Guinn (Guinns) against David Rust, Rose Acre Farms, Inc., Lookacres, Inc., and Eggacres, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Eggacres when appropriate). Upon Egga-cres’ motion, the trial was bifurcated. Following a bench trial, the trial court ruled that a private nuisance existed and that such was abatable. Upon trial to a jury on the issue of damages, such were assessed against Eggacres in the amount of $9,500. Costs of the action…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dahlberg v. OgleIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tapp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Trees by & Through Trees v. K-MARTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API