Legal Opinion

Sumitronics Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 31, 1995No. Court No. 89-03-00148Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiCarlo, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Sumitronics Inc. contests the denial of protests filed pursuant to section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1515 (1988). Plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56(a), requesting that the court sustain plaintiffs protests and direct the United States Customs Service to reliquidate the imported merchandise under plaintiffs proposed classification. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988).

Background

The imported merchandise consists of electrostatic writing heads used in Benson/Schlumberger…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. American Lamb Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  5. General Methods Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API