Legal Opinion

General Methods Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1972No. 5437, C.A.D. 1049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division,1 overruling appellant’s protest *110concerning the classification of merchandise identified as an “Automatic Meta Capsule Production Machine.” The merchandise was classified under item 674.35, TSUS, as metal working machine tools. Appellant claims that the imported merchandise is properly classifiable as a machine, not specially provided for, under item 678.50, TSUS.

The pertinent provisions of the Tariff Schedules read as follows:

Schedule 6 — Part 4

SUBPART F.-MACHINES FOB WORKING…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. General Methods Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington International Insurance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Data Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. American Rusch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  5. Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API