Legal Opinion
In Re Slavin
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2006No. 05-BG-885PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, 1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that reciprocal and identical discipline be imposed in the form of a two-year suspension of respondent. The Board also recommends that his reinstatement be conditioned upon his demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that he has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for readmission, and that his resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the Bar, or the administration of justice, or subversive to the public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re FeirmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SlavinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007