Legal Opinion
Smith v. Loftis Bros.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 15, 1931No. 20870PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, E. J.
1. “Where parties have reduced to writing what appears to be a complete and certain agreement, it will, in the absence of fraud, accident, or mistake, be conclusively presumed that the writing contains the entire contract, and parol evidence of prior or contemporaneous representations or statements is inadmissible to add to, take from, or vary the written instrument.” Bullard v. Brewer, 118 Ga. 918 (45 S. E. 711) ; Barfield v. Farkas, 40 Ga. App. 559 (3) (150 S. E. 600). Accordingly, in a suit brought by the vendor of personalty sold under an express warranty and described in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bullard v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Henderson Elevator Co. v. North Georgia Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Cook & Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Barfield v. FarkasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Springer v. Indianapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Indiana Truck Corp. v. GlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Neuhoff v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Frick Company Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943