Legal Opinion

Neuhoff v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1936No. 25784PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

Arthur Neuhoff brought suit against Swift & Company and E. S. Papy, alleging that they had injured and damaged him in the sum of $75,000, by reason of the following facts: On January 5, 1931, and at all times thereafter, as mentioned in the petition, E. S. Papy was general manager of Swift & Company, with authority to employ and discharge persons working with that company. The petitioner was the owner of one hundred shares of the stock of the Neuhoff Company, which owned and operated the White Provision Company, of which petitioner was assistant general manager at a salary of $500 per month.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bullard v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Holcomb v. Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Indiana Truck Corp. v. GlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Perkins Co. v. Shewmake & MurpheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Hudson v. Venture Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Rhine v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Stanaland v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Cooper v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API