Indiana Truck Corp. v. Glock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
It is true that a prior or contemporaneous parol agreement, which contradicts, varies, or otherwise modifies a written agreement between the same parties and pertaining to the same subject-matter, is merged into the written agreement; and that where parties have reduced to writing what appears to be a complete and certain agreement, it will, in the absence Of fraud, be conclusively presumed that the writing contains the entire contract. Bullard v. Brewer, 118 Ga. 918 (45 S. E. 711) ; LaGrange Female College v. Cary, 168 Ga. 291 (147 S. E. 390); *520Smith v. Loftis, 43 Ga. App. 354 (158 S. E.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bullard v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Juniata Building & Loan Ass'n v. HetzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Cullmans v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Brown v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- New York Life Insurance Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stonecypher v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Cooper v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Neuhoff v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.