Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Boland

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 26, 1996No. 95-P-111PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

In this medical malpractice case tried in the Superior Court, the jury found for the defendant surgeon. In her appeal, the plaintiff challenges the failure of the trial judge to instruct the juiy on the doctrine sometimes referred to as res ipsa loquitur. The doctrine has been applied where the facts in a medical malpractice case are such that the jury from their common knowledge and experience may find, without knowing the exact cause of the accident, that the harm which befell the plaintiff was more likely due to the negligence of the defendant than to some other cause for *376which the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Department of Youth Services v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Flood v. Southland Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Enrich v. Windmere Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. CasanovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Geshke v. Crocs, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  4. Saunders v. ReadyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Ryba v. LaLancetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API