Commonwealth v. Casanova
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.
Commonwealth v. McIntyre, 436 Mass. 829 (2002), establishes that the scope of restitution in a criminal proceeding is limited to loss or damage that is “causally connected to the offense and bears a significant relationship to the offense” (citation omitted). Id. at 835. On appeal from a restitution order that required payment for lost tuition occasioned by the victim’s withdrawal from college, the defendant maintains that the judge erred in concluding that the victim’s postincident condition, and subsequent withdrawal, were caused by the defendant’s attack. We conclude that the evidence was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Glaubius v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Enrich v. Windmere Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BoucherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DenehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. McCullochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Morris M.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MalickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.