Legal Opinion

Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1999PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Justice.

We granted this appeal to address whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, as codified at Tennessee Code Annotated section 29 — 26—115(c), is applicable in medical malpractice cases where the plaintiffs must rely upon expert testimony to prove the elements of causation, standard of care, and that the injury does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence. Upon review of Tennessee’s medical malpractice law and the authority in other jurisdictions, we conclude that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may be applied under those .circumstances. The…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Robinson v. OmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Doe v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Webber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Pero's Steak and Spaghetti House v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API