Hines v. Taft
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam 1
This is an appeal from the portion of an order of the district court affirming an order of the probate court wherein it. was ordered, adjudged, and decreed that loss of certain moneys deposited in a bank must be borne by the ward and not by the guardian, and releasing the guardian from any liability for any such loss.
*651This order of the district court affirming the probate court is not appeal-able. Ebeling v. Bayerl, 162 Minn. 379, 202 N. W. 817. Upon the record, this court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.
On Appeal From Disallowance of Costs.
On March 18, 1932, the following…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Ebeling v. BayerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. FullertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- In Re Guardianship of Robert AhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932