Legal Opinion

State v. Fullerton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1913No. Nos. 18,328—(9)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $18,372.-75 from the treasurer of the State Board of Medical Examiners. From an order, Catlin, J., sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

The state appeals from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint.

It claims the right, in the pleading attacked, to recover from defendant, as secretary and treasurer of the State Board of Medical Examiners, all moneys received by him under the provisions of Laws 1905, p. 370, c. 236, and R. L. 1905, §§ 2302, 2303, between January, 1906, and February, 1912. Appropriate allegations are made in this regard, the theory of defendant’s liability being predicated upon R. L. 1905, § 66, requiring executive officers of the state to pay into the state treasury all fees and charges…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. State v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Williams v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. State v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Hogan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Hines v. TaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. In Re Guardianship of Robert AhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API