Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Robert Ahlman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1932No. 28,739PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 240 N.W. 890, 241 N.W. 796. The guardian then sought to tax costs and disbursements in this court. The clerk disallowed them on the ground that costs cannot be recovered against the United States acting in its governmental capacity. From the order of disallowance the guardian appealed. Clerk's disallowance of costs affirmed. This is an appeal from the portion of an order of the district court affirming an order of the probate court wherein it was ordered, adjudged, and decreed that loss of certain moneys deposited in a bank must be borne by the ward and not by the guardian, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Banwell v. RisdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ebeling v. BayerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Corwin v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Hines v. TaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API