Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 1932No. Nos. 28,679, 28,825PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Relator has appealed from the clerk’s disallowance of costs and disbursements.
This action was prosecuted by plaintiff as a taxpayer to test the validity of H. F. 1456 (see L. 1931, p. 640) being in the form of a resolution assuming to reapportion the congressional districts of the state. The respondent, the secretary, of state, presumably acting under the advice of the attorney general, was administering his office in obedience to the resolution which the governor had vetoed; but it was claimed that the veto was ineffectual. This court in 184 Minn. 228, 238 N. W. 494, sustained the contention…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Board of Christian Service of Lutheran Minnesota Conference v. School Board of Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.