Legal Opinion

State v. Buckman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1905No. Nos. 14,316—(22)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $67,850.31 for conversion of state timber. From an order, Brill, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This action is brought by the state of Minnesota to recover upon three causes of action — on the first for pine logs cut from lands of the state in St. Louis county, on the second for logs of the state cut from lands in Itasca county, and on the third for another specific number of logs of the state cut in Itasca county. It was alleged in the two first-named claims that defendant knowingly, wilfully, and unlawfully cut, carried away, and converted the timber without having permission or authority to do so, and treble damages are sought for these trespasses. In the third cause of action the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API