Van Hosen v. Bankers Trust Company
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINGS, Justice.
By action in equity plaintiff Hugh Van Hosen seeks declaratory relief from the forfeiture provision of a private pension plan established by defendant Bankers Trust Company and administered by it as trustee. Trial court adjudged the controverted proviso violative of public policy, therefore void and unenforceable. Defendants appeal. We affirm.
Van Hosen worked for defendant bank almost 33 years prior to his resignation in 1967. Starting as a messenger he ultimately became a vice-president and manager of installment loans. While so employed certain pension and profit sharing…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Bauer v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- The Rochester Corporation v. W. L. Rochester, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Almers v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Sheppard v. Blackstock Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Dealers Warehouse Co. v. Wahl & AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Pathology Consultants v. GrattonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.