Legal Opinion
Himrich v. Carpenter
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEAN, Circuit Judge.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/FACTUAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 1.] In 1994 the South Dakota Supreme Court held that a lease-purchase agreement between the City of Custer (City) and Homes, Inc., which included the Custer City Attorney, Gerald Baldwin (Baldwin), as one of the principles, was null and void as viola-tive of public policy under SDCL 6-1-1. Speckels v. Baldwin, 512 N.W.2d 171 (S.D.1994). Subsequent to that decision, Baldwin and E.A. Himrich (Himrieh) instituted a legal negligence lawsuit against Edward C. Carpenter (Carpenter) 'and his legal partnership. Carpenter had represented…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. John Addison BallisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Josephson v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Action Mechanical, Inc. v. Deadwood Historic Preservation CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Juttelstad v. JuttelstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Johnson v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Cooper v. JamesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.