Broad, Vogt & Conant, Inc. v. Alsthom Automation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [docket entry 3]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs’ motion.
This case essentially involves a dispute related to the negotiation and performance of two construction contracts. Pursuant to these contracts, Plaintiffs were to design, manufacture, and install a conveyor system at a General Motors assembly facility in Silao, Mexico. Under the two contracts, Plaintiffs were to earn over $8,000,000 upon completion of the construction project. However,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Padilla v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- City of New Rochelle v. Town of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Kabealo v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Uppal v. Electronic Data SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Frankel v. DETROIT MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Gaines v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Porter v. RoosaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003