Legal Opinion
Kabealo v. Davis
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 7, 1993No. C2-93-618PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion to remand this ease to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio. Plaintiff argues that remand is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) for the reason that state law matters predominate in this case.
The general provisions for the removal of actions from state court are contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), a defendant may remove any civil action over which the district court has original jurisdiction, unless removal is prohibited by some other specific statutory provision.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Moore v. DeBiaseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- No. 94-3025Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Borough of West Mifflin v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Padilla v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- City of New Rochelle v. Town of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Salei v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.