Legal Opinion
Uppal v. Electronic Data Systems
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 6, 2004No. 03-75093PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
COHN, District Judge.
The party seeking removal should take care to identify all possible bases of federal subject matter jurisdiction over the suit in its notice of removal because the district court may decline to assert jurisdiction over the case for reasons not averred in the removal notice and deny the removing party leave to amend its notice to include further grounds of federal subject matter jurisdiction after the expiration of the relevant time period.
14C Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc. David EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Thomas P. Loftis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. David Cole, Kenneth AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Tech Hills II Associates, Cross-Appellee v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hahn v. RauchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Whitehead v. the Nautilus Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2006
- Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanUnited States Circuit Court · 2019
- Baker v. Apple Investors Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Belfor U.S.A. Group, Inc. v. Salem Consumer Square OH LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.