Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Company v. Boerger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1965No. 4325PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

The question in this suit by insured against the health and accident insurer is stated by the insurer to be whether insured “actually made out a case of ‘repudiation’.”

Judgment was rendered for insured for the commuted value of “unaccrued disability benefits” on jury findings to the effect that insured will be totally disabled for 537 weeks, and that insurer’s agent told insured the company “had paid him all the money it owed under the terms of the policy in question and did not intend to make any more payments under such policy in the future.”

Appellant says there is no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Moore v. JenkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mabel Smith Crouch v. Parsons Thomas CrouchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Glass v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hubble v. Lone Star Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Group Life & Health Insurance Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API