Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Pollack

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1931No. 1471—5709PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCritz, J.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported at 23 S.W.(2d) 890. In the interest of brevity, we refer to and adopt the statement made by that court. However, in order that this opinion be as nearly complete as possible, we make the following statement of the nature and result of the suit:

It seems that on and prior to January 21, 1911, Henry and Charles Pollack, who are brothers, were partners in a trunk factory and certain other properties. On said date they entered into the following contract in writing:

“ ‘Whereas, Henry Pollack and Charles Pollack, of the County and State…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Mabel Smith Crouch v. Parsons Thomas CrouchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Dixie Glass Co. v. PollakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API