Legal Opinion

Hubble v. Lone Star Contracting Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1994No. 2-93-264-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Appellant G. Craig Hubble, Trustee (“Hubble”), appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee Lone Star Contracting Corp. (“Lone Star”) in which the trial court foreclosed Lone Star’s mechanic’s and material-men’s hen on a three-acre tract (the “Property”) owned by Hubble. On appeal Hubble raises three points of error contending that the trial court erred: (1) in granting judgment foreclosing Lone Star’s hen on the Property because the hen is barred by limitations; (2) in failing to find that Lone Star’s cause of action accrued for limitations purposes more than four…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Clute v. City of Lake JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Okon v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Valero Energy Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kona Technology Corp. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Pagosa Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. Marrs & Smith Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  4. City of Corpus Christi v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Beesley v. Hydrocarbon Separation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API