Legal Opinion

Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. Sanders

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1937No. 6836PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Plaintiff in error will be called defendant and defendant in error plaintiff in accordance with their respective designations in the trial court. A general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained by the trial judge and, upon her refusal further to amend, the case was dismissed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed that judgment and remanded the cause for trial on its merits. 74 S. W. (2d) 301. A rather full statement of the allegations of the petition is made by the Court of Civil Appeals. For the purposes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Daley v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. American National Ins. Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. DenningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Mabel Smith Crouch v. Parsons Thomas CrouchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. General Electric Supply Co. v. Gulf Electroquip, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Sanders v. Aetna Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API