Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Pollack
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1932No. Motion No. 9921; No. 1471-5709PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCritz, J.
Our original opinion, which is found in 39 S.W.(2d) 853, 855, states the nature and result of this case, and we refer to that opinion for that purpose.
After the rendition of the judgment recommended in our original. opinion, the first motion for rehearing filed herein by Henry Pollack was overruled by .the Supreme Court on our recommendation. After the rendition of the judgment overruling the first motion for rehéaring, the Supreme Court has permitted Henry. Pollack to file a second motion for rehearing, such permission being also granted on our recommendation.
In our original opinion we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Murray v. Crest Construction, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- General Electric Supply Co. v. Gulf Electroquip, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Taylor Publishing Co. v. Systems Marketing Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.