Legal Opinion
Leggio v. Haggerty
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1965No. Civ. 387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (R. M.), J.
This action, brought by the plaintiff, seeks a declaration of the rights of the parties in certain spring water located in a portion of what is described as Section 2, Township 27 South, Range 33 East, M. D. B. & M., in the Lake Isabella area in the County of Kern (the servient tenement).
In 1898 the owners of the property in Section 2, Brady, Brady and Mulligan, granted to Walker Rankin all of the water flowing from the springs in said Section 2, together with certain rights to maintain dams, wiers and aqueducts necessary for the proper development of the water, together with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Zanelli v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Noronha v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Anaheim v. METRO. WATER DIST. OF S. CAL.California Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.