Legal Opinion

United States v. Estrada

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 8, 1957No. 9191PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

HomeR Ferguson, Judge:

The accused below, appellant here, was convicted by a special court-martial of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad-conduct discharge, to forfeit $55.00 per month for four months, and to be confined at hard labor for a like period. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence but suspended the execution of the bad-conduct discharge until release from confinement or completion of appellate review, whichever occurred later. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. LittriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. StringerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. IsbellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. GradyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. CumminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. KirschUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API