Legal Opinion

United States v. Kirsch

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 16, 1964No. 17,519PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Although given a grant by Major General B. F. Taylor, Commander of the 24th Infantry Division, which re*87cited he would have “immunity from prosecution for any offense” he might testify to at the trial of a fellow soldier, the accused refused to answer questions asked him by trial counsel, on the ground his answers would tend to incriminate him. Thereafter, he was charged with, and pleaded guilty to, willful refusal to testify, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. Notwithstanding his plea of guilty, the accused now…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moyer Reed Plaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. WimberleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. HardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. VillinesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. WebsterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API