Lashbrook v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The defendant, Daniel Lashbrook, appeals his conviction and sixty-year sentence for the September 1998, murder 1 of Duane Morton. Finding that the defendant's appellate claims of multiple eviden-tiary errors and excessive sentence are not compelling, we affirm.
The defendant first contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that a person other than the defendant had previously stated that the victim "was gonna die." As the defense began to present its case, the State requested a bench conference and moved to exclude anticipated testimony of defense witnesses that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Feliciano v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Houston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Joseph Fuentes v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Pelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mathis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.