Legal Opinion
Sargent v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 2007No. 49A02-0610-CR-856PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Martin Sargent (“Sargent”) appeals from his convictions after a bench trial of two counts of incest. Ind.Code § 35-46-1-3. We affirm.
Sargent raises three issues for our review. First, Sargent asks us to determine whether the trial court properly excluded impeaching evidence. Second, Sargent asks us to determine if the evidence is sufficient to support his convictions, specifically examining the trial court’s credibility determination. Third, Sargent asks us to determine if he was correctly sentenced.
The facts most favorable to the convictions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Cox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Tunstill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Bacher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Holloway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Agustin Martinez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Andrew Albert Graovac v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Billie K. Hoots v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.