Legal Opinion

Pelley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2009No. 71S05-0808-CR-446PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Robert Jeffrey Pelley appeals his convie-tions for the murders of his father, stepmother, and two stepsisters. We affirm Pelley's convictions. We hold that the Criminal Rule 4(C) period does not include the time for the State's interlocutory appeal when trial court proceedings have been stayed. We also hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and the trial court did not err in its challenged evidentiary rulings or in denying Pelley's motion for a special prosecutor.

Facts and Procedural History

In 2007, a jury found Pelley 1 guilty of the 1989 murders of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. O'CONNELL v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Vermillion v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Winston K. Wood v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Feuston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API