Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Loomis
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 24, 2014No. Civ. No. S-10-458 KJM KJNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
K.J. MUELLER, District Judge.
A motion for remedies filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against defendant Lawrence “Lee” Loomis (Loomis) is currently pending before the court. The motion was submitted without argument and the court now GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 23, 2010, the SEC filed a complaint against Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions (LWS), LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLC (defendants), alleging the defendants had misappropriated approximately $10 million from investors through the fraudulent sale of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. H. Thomas FehnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. Rubera, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. RuberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jt Wallenbrock & Associates Citadel Capital Management Group, Inc., and Larry Toshio Osaki Van Y. IchinotsuboCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: Sharon Louise MacDonellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. SLRA Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crypto Traders Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024