Legal Opinion

In Re: Sharon Louise MacDonell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 13, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01332Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE APPLICATION OF SHARON No. 2:20-cv-1332 KJM DB LOUISE MACDONELL, 12 Applicant 13 ORDER 14 15 16 17 On July 1, 2020, Sharon Louise MacDonell, (“Applicant”), filed an ex parte application to 18 issue subpoenas pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1782

in connection with an action pending in another 19 country. (ECF No. 1.) The matter has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 20 302(c)(1). For the reasons explained below, Applicant’s request is granted. 21 BACKGROUND 22 Applicant and Roger…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. In Re Premises Located at 840 140th Ave. NeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel ProsyankinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. v. Fibrogen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LoomisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API