Legal Opinion

Romero-Barcelo v. Acevedo-Vila

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided July 31, 2003No. 00-091(JAF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FUSTE, District Judge.

On June 23, 2000, Carlos Romero-Bar-celó (“Petitioner Romero-Barceló”), filed a motion requesting disbarment of Aníbal Acevedo-Vilá (“Respondent Acevedo-Vilá”). After evidentiary and formal disciplinary hearings, a Panel (“Panel”) appointed by this court rendered its Report and Recommendation (“Report”) on April 16, 2003. Docket Document No. 67. The Panel recommended that Respondent be publicly reprimanded for violations of Rule 8.4 and 3.1 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Respondent Acevedo-Vilá opposed the Report, raising objections to the…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Scranton Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Halvonik v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Goldstein v. MoatzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API