Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Lawrence

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1938No. S. F. 15901PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Following a transfer of the above-entitled cause to this court after decision and judgment by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, this court is satisfied with the opinion rendered by that court and division, written by Mr. Associate Justice Spence, as follows, and adopts the same as and for the decision and opinion of this court:

“Plaintiff, an importer, filed his complaint for declaratory relief. The defendants Lawrence and Tuttle were attorneys at law and defendant Pitt was a custom house broker. Defendants filed separate answers and in addition…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  3. Raisin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rice v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Carpentier v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API