Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Casaudoumecq

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1962No. Civ. 6822PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment after verdict awarding attorney’s fees. The plaintiff, respondent herein, is the assignee of two claims for attorney’s fees; one for $11,000 and another for $542.30; by amended complaint set forth each claim under an express contract count and also under an implied contract count; and obtained judgment, after a jury trial, based on a general verdict in her favor in the total sum of $11,000. The defendant, appellant herein, answered; denied generally the allegations of the amended complaint; did not allege any special defenses; and appealed from the judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CrookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Morin v. ABA Recovery Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API