Legal Opinion

Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1940No. L. A. 16755PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting the plaintiffs’ title to real property and declaring the property free of certain building restrictions. The defendant and appellant Aetna Construction Company, is the owner of adjoining property. The question decisive of the case is whether certain covenants in the plaintiffs’ chain of title are binding upon them, either as covenants running with the land or as equitable servitudes.

The parties are substantially agreed upon the facts. In 1922 F. E. Woodley and his wife owned two adjoining lots (designated herein as lots 6 and 7) on Havenhurst Drive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Colón Padilla v. San Patricio Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  3. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API