State of California v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Petitioners seek writ of prohibition to restrain the Sacramento County Superior Court from enforcing its order granting post-administrative hearing discovery to real party in interest, A. H. Robins Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Robins”), and directing petitioners Brian and Pennebaker to answer questions.
Questions Presented
1. Is this an appropriate proceeding for the issuance of the writ of prohibition?
2. Does post-administrative hearing discovery lie?
3. Does Robins have an administrative remedy?
Record
Petitioner Earl W. Brian, Jr., M.D., is the Director of Health Care Services…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Public Service Commission v. Patuxent Valley Conservation LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Transcentury Properties v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.